For conceptual clarification I will divide casting into two categories:
1. Casting based solely on physical attributes
2. Casting based on ability to interpret the speaking role.
Colorblind casting (also known as Non-Traditional casting) is where
characters for a performed work (theater, TV, film) are cast without
prejudice to race, gender, age, etc. But this is not covered in this
write up because most casting directors already have a structure given
to them by the Director based on the script.
Example 1. If the script requires a 25yr old black male, running in the
park; Casting a 50yr old white female for the role is wrong.
Example 2. If you now cast a 25yr Black athletic male, who is exceptional
when delivering his lines in English, He will be useless if the film is in
Ibo language. It is important to note here that cases abound where the actor
cant speak the language, but they are taught it on set. But this usually
happens with big names or if the line is minor.
I want to separate the physical attribute of the talent, from the ability
to interpret the role verbally. The "Ability over Appearance" debate has
raged before Shakespeare and would continue.
I have always said it is okay to pick a side, but do that on a project by project
basis.
In extreme drama where facial expression and good line delivery is expected,
it is expected to have a bias towards ability. In an extreme case in the Kim & Ray-jay
sex tape, casting Rapper Rick Ross with Kim will not have the same commercial success.
I have a bias for appearance, because movie making is a visual medium. More importantly
you can teach a beautiful person to improve her acting skill, but an ugly person will
always be ugly.
I take appearance as a TALENT in itself. When the person is beautiful and talented
it is a win win situation.
To make your day here are two talented and beautiful women, Amber Rose representing Hollywood,
and Brun Njua representing Nollywood.
